The Qui Tam Team Blog Join In the Fight Against Fraud

28Jan/100

Swiss Bank Whistleblower Smack Down

The Swiss banking industry is being hit particularly hard right now by some high-profile whistleblowers. We've already written a few words about Bradley Birkenfeld, the UBS whistleblower who stands to receive billions of dollars from the I.R.S. for helping to identify thousands of tax cheats. Another Swiss banker is coming forward with information that could further erode the historically impenetrable shroud of secrecy surrounding the Swiss banking industry.

Rudolf M. Elmer was COO for the Julius Baer Swiss bank until he was fired in 2002. Like Bradley Birkenfeld, Elmer lived the high life of a banker to the elite, albeit in the warmer (but equally tax evasion-friendly) clime of the Cayman Islands. Elmer's story is also reminiscent of that of another whistleblower profiled on this blog, big tobacco burner Dr. Jeffrey Wigand. Like Wigand, Elmer was harassed by private investigators allegedly hired by his former employer.

The fact that Elmer ran Julius Baer's operations in the Caymans is especially significant. The Caymans have a zero per cent tax rate, and their tax havens are believed to hold more than $11.5 trillion. It is estimated that the U.S. loses approximately $100 billion in taxes each year to tax evasion committed in the Caymans. Another significant fact about the Caymans, sure to elicit horror/admiration, depending on whom you ask, is this: 10 per cent of the islands' 52,000 inhabitants are accountants or lawyers.

Elmer discovered the documents in 2002, shortly before he was fired (the bank claims that he was angry about being passed over for a promotion and stole the documents). The documents concern scores of companies, trusts, and individuals. Elmer began turning the documents over to authorities, and was briefly jailed in2005 by Swiss authorities who plan to charge him with violations of Swiss secrecy laws. In 2009, Elmer posted documents to the Wikileaks website, which allows users (particularly whistleblowers) to post important documents securely. Julius Baer went to court and got the site shut down, but Wikilinks appealed and got the court order overturned.

Julius Baer's suit against Wikilinks drew the I.R.S.'s attention, and the agency contacted Elmer. Elmer subsequently turned over documents to the I.R.S., the New York City DA, and the Senate subcommittee on investigations headed by Senator Carl Levin.

Elmer's interest in holding the bank accountable goes beyond anything personal. In an interview with The Guardian, he stated

People don't know how the system works. They may hear of some case, but the big picture always disappears into bank secrecy, professional secrecy with lawyers and accountants, and tax secrecy. But they need to know that this is a system which undermines our society, our democracy.

Elmer doesn't seem to be revealing Julius Baer's secrets just to get a financial reward. He is thinking about the bigger picture here, and like many whistleblowers, he's willing to give up his career and even do some jail time to stand up against a wrongdoer.

21Jan/100

Bringing/Filing a Qui Tam Claim

Have you witnessed some type of fraud against the government? Well, you should consider talking with an attorney on the Qui Tam Team. Here's a brief overview of what bringing a qui tam suit involves. An attorney can give you more information and provide legal advice.

Keep in mind that you must file a qui tam suit in order to be eligible for a whistleblower reward under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729–3733.

How long do you have to bring your claim? Under 31 U.S.C.S 3721, a civil action under the False Claims Act must be brought

  • a maximum of six years after the violation of the False Claims Act was committed; or
  • a maximum three years after the date when the government knew or should have known about the violation, but no more than ten years after the date on which the violation was committed.

Once a qui tam claim is filed, it remains under seal while the government decides whether it will intervene. If the government does decide to intervene in your case, it can file its own complaint or amend the complaint filed by the relator (the whistleblower). 31 USCS 3730(b). The government may clarify the claims in which it is intervening or add new claims.

In order to bring a qui tam suit, a relator MUST be represented by an attorney. The reason for this was discussed in United States ex rel. Fisher v. Network Software Assoc., 377 F. Supp. 2d 195; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14430 (D.D.C, 2005). The court explained that even though the relator has an interest in the outcome of the case, the real party in interest is the United States, even if the government decides not to intervene. Allowing a plaintiff to go forward without an attorney could je0pardize the government's chances of succeeding in the case in the future, so courts do not allow an unrepresented plaintiff to bring a qui tam suit. The stakes are just too high if the government has a chance to get some money back.

How is it filed?

A qui tam claim must be filed by your attorney in federal district court in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A copy of the complaint must be served on the Attorney General of the United States along with a statement of the material evidence in the whistleblower's possession.

Note that the complaint must be filed confidentially and kept under seal. Until the court gives permission to do so, the complaint must not be served on the defendant in order to maintain strict confidentiality. If the complaint is served without the court's permission, the qui tam suit will be dismissed!

Once the complaint has been filed, get ready to wait. It can take months for the government to decide whether it will intervene. In the meantime, you can catch up on your whistleblower movies, like The Insider...

Tagged as: No Comments
15Jan/100

Gathering Evidence for a False Claims Act Case

Under the federal False Claims Act, the federal government may take action against an individual or entity that knowingly cheats the government in one form or another by making a false claim. If you observe fraud against the government, you MUST file a qui tam suit in order to be eligible for a whistleblower reward. If you believe that you have observed some type of fraud against the government, it's important to consider the evidence that will be required to prove that fraud occurred. The evidence must show that the individual/entity knowingly defrauded the government. The Department of Justice joins only about 25% of qui tam cases, and because the DOJ has to be so selective based on the volume of cases and the limited number of attorneys available to try them, only cases with strong evidence are selected. This is why you should keep evidence gathering in mind from the minute you believe you have observed fraud against the government.

What kind of evidence should you gather? This will depend somewhat on your industry. In general, you need to gather evidence showing that the government was cheated. Fraud against the government can take many forms. Some examples include:

  • Knowingly presenting a false claim for payment or approval to the government;
  • Knowingly making a false statement as part of a claim to the government;
  • Possessing property or money used or to be used by the government and knowingly turning over less than all that money/property;
  • Knowingly making a false statment or record related to an obligation to pay money/transmit property to the government;
  • Knowingly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay money to the government.

The specific types of evidence you should consider gathering include:

  • Invoices and vouchers;
  • Memos;
  • Emails;
  • Voicemails and text messages;
  • Photographs;
  • Plans, drawings, and specs;
  • Contracts;
  • Accounting documents;
  • Bank records and credit card statements;
  • Factory/manufacturing records.

In the case of electronic records, such as emails (which often constitute the bulk of modern business), there are numerous programs and techniques available to recover data that would otherwise be considered lost. Even if a file has been deleted, usually it can still be recovered.

Your chances of recovering a reward in a qui tam case increase greatly when you hire an attorney. An attorney with experience trying qui tam cases will help you through the daunting process of gathering evidence. If you believe that you have observed fraud committed against the government, contact the Qui Tam Team for free advice.