Why It’s Worth It To Be a Whistleblower
This post was written by admin
Many question the worth of being a whistleblower. “Is it worth the time and effort?” “Will I lose my job?” “What good will it bring me?” Overall, “is it worth it?” Being a whistleblower is a tedious process—cases can take years, to hire lawyers you need to have money, and many people seem to think that it may even make you lose your job. Let’s go through each of these pieces to the whistleblowing process: time, money, and risk.
Whistleblowing is a time commitment. It requires gathering first-hand specific information about fraudulent activity, working with lawyers, spending time in negotiations or court, etc. Many qui tam cases take years to settle.
Whistleblowing also requires money as hiring lawyers is necessary. However, the money used to pay lawyers may be reimbursed to you after winning a case. In our recent article on quitamteam.com, “Jury: College & Faculty Member Committed Fraud,” the whistleblower in the case, Dr. Daniel Feldman, is likely to be reimbursed. Dr. Feldman filed the case in 2003, and it has taken 7 years for the final ruling to be issued. Dr. Feldman’s fees and costs to his lawyers cost several hundred thousand dollars, which may be reimbursed to him in full!
Many think whistleblowing is a risky business. But, contrary to popular belief, the risks are not very high as whistleblowers are protected by law. For instance, many people think that whistleblowing involves the risk of losing your job, but under the False Claims Act (FCA), the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), and other laws that protect whistleblowers, whistleblowers cannot be fired for whistleblowing. According to the Department of Labor website, “Whistleblowers may not be transferred, denied a raise, have their hours reduced, or be fired or punished in any other way because they have exercised any right afforded to them under one of the laws that protect whistleblowers.” So while whistleblowing may seem risky, the law is on the whistleblower’s side to protect him/her from any punishment as a result of whistleblowing.
So whistleblowing takes time, can take money, but is not very risky. But still “why do it?” “Is it worth it?” “What good will it bring you?” The reward of being a whistleblower is not only self-satisfaction, but a heavy pay-off if you win the case. In order to receive a reward for being a whistleblower, the government must recover at least $1 million in the case. Whistleblowers receive a mandatory minimum of 10 percent, to a maximum of 30 percent of what is recovered. Therefore, if whistleblowers are awarded in cases recovering $1 million or more, a whistleblower will make between $100,000 and $300,000 at least. For larger cases, a whistleblower must still receive at least 10 percent of the claim, and can make more than $100,000 to $300,000. In the HCA case in 2003, the numerous whistleblowers received $151,591,500. The largest Healthcare fraud settlement in U.S. history, against Pfizer Inc., paid six whistleblowers more than $102 million. So while whistleblowing may take time, it is worth it. Overall, you can be reimbursed for payments to attorneys, you will not incur much risk, and you will make at least $100,000 if your case wins.
Dr. Feldman sums up why it’s worth being a whistleblower. He stated that, “being a whistleblower is not something you undertake without tremendous sacrifice,” because of the time and risk involved. However, he agreed that “In the end, prevailing certainty feels great and worth the cost to do the right thing” (Source: Salmanson Goldshaw).
Sources:
Henning, Peter J. “Come Blow Your Horn for the S.E.C.” The New York Times DealBook Blog. 26 July 2010. http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/come-blow-your-horn-to-the-s-e-c/.
Montopoli, Brian. “Obama Signs Sweeping Financial Reform Into Law.” CBSNews. 21 July 2010. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20011201-503544.html Salmanson Goldshaw, P.C. as per PR Newswire. PR Newswire. “Federal Jury Finds Cornell University’s Medical College Committed Fraud.” 29 July 2010. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/federal-jury-finds-cornell-universitys-medical-college-committed-fraud-99538899.html.
Savage, David. “Financial reform law includes big cash incentives for whistle-blowers.” Los Angeles Times. 23 July 2010.http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-reform-whistleblower-20100723,0,6099636.story.
United States Department of Health & Human Services. News Release. “Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in its History.” 2 September 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2009pres/09/20090902a.html.
United States Department of Justice. “Largest Health Care Fraud Case In U.S. History Settled HCA Investigation News Record Total of $1.7 Billion.” 26 June 2003. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm.
United States Department of Labor. “Whistleblower Protections.” http://www.dol.gov/compliance/laws/comp-whistleblower.htm.
This article is brought to you by the QTT, the epicenter for whistleblowers and people interested in the False Claims Act, Qui Tam Provisions, and Medicare and Medicaid fraud. To discuss a potential case, please call Eric Young at 1 (800) 590-4116.
FCA Warming
This post was written by Josh
This is not a good climate in which to be committing fraud against the government. A new article notes that the FCA is on fire, concluding that
[u]nprecedented government spending, recent amendments to the FCA, increased fraud enforcement budgets and priorities, skyrocketing FCA recoveries, state legislative and enforcement activities, and the sheer volume of ongoing government investigations and pending qui tam actions suggest that the FCA will remain the fastest growing area of federal litigation.
One of the most important factors contributing to FCA mania is lawmakers' obsession with tweaking the Act. The FCA has already been amended twice in the first six months of 2010, and Congress is hankering to amend the FCA once again.
Congress passed the Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act ("FERA'') in May 2009. FERA made some of the most significant amendments to the FCA in 20 years. FERA already expanded protections for agents or contractors who blow the whistle. The latest version of the Financial Reform Bill would expand the scope of protected whistleblower conduct to include not only "efforts to stop 1 or more violations" but also lawful behavior "in furtherance of an action'' under the FCA.
Massive outlays of federal dollars combined with Congress's FCA infatuation guarantee that these types of cases will stay hot. 2010 may well be the year of titanic clashes over the FCA, so grab a front row seat as the dollars fly!
This article is brought to you by the QTT, the epicenter for whistleblowers and people interested in the False Claims Act, Qui Tam Provisions, and Medicare and Medicaid fraud. To discuss a potential case, please call Eric Young at 1 (800) 590-4116.
Crankin’up the HEAT
This post was written by Josh
HEAT is the rather odd acronym for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team. It is the brainchild of Attorney General Holder and Health and Human Services Secretary Sebelius, and despite the great stretches of the imagination it takes to make it work as an acronym (HCFPEAT doesn't exactly roll off the tongue), it seems to be taking a bite out of health care fraud.
HEAT is a coordinated effort between DOJ and HHS, and it has a Medicare Fraud Strike Force that has been going around various cities busting health care fraud perps. It's operating in various locations, including South Florida, but no, you are not likely to see Attorney General Holder wearing a Miami Vice suit and driving a go-fast boat into a medical center.
In recent testimony given before the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health and Oversight, Edward Siskel, the Associate Deputy Attorney General, stated that since May 2009, the Strike Force has been putting fear in the hearts of health care fraudsters. Strike Force prosecutors have filed over 120 cases charging more than 290 defendants and have obtained 16 convictions. The Strike Force also appears to have had a deterrent effect. In the twelve months since the Strike Force was announced, the Miami area has seen an almost $2 billion reduction in durable medical equipment submissions compared to the preceding 12 month period.
Deputy AG Siskel also notes in his testimony statistics all too familiar to qui tamers: the bulk of the DOJ's civil case load comprises suits against drug and medical device makers. Qui tam suits have proved to be an important weapon in the DOJ's fraud-fighting arsenal, and have helped the government to recover $24 billion since 1986. This goes to show that the civil justice system is just as important as the swaggering Task Force in the fight against health care fraud.
This article is brought to you by the QTT, the epicenter for whistleblowers and people interested in the False Claims Act, Qui Tam Provisions, and Medicare and Medicaid fraud. To discuss a potential case, please call Eric Young at 1 (800) 590-4116.



